Samuel M Wilson, DO

Dermatology · Roosevelt, UT · Utah outside metro areas · In the data 2014 to 2024 · NPI 1477865194

See where Samuel M Wilson, DO ranks among 147 Dermatology peers

The Physician Report shows Medicare work, payment, the comparison with similar practices and the trend across the data years.

Reports are not on sale yet.

View sample report

Already purchased? Open your report

What the Physician Report contains

Show details13 known limitations

Included

  • Exact Medicare payment figures for each data year
  • Calculated Medicare fee-for-service work RVUs for each data year
  • Historical results for every data year with usable data
  • Peer comparisons: rank, percentile and rank band among the same specialty, the peer medians, and where the physician falls in the peer distribution
  • Beneficiaries, services, service mix and code-level lines
  • A printable report with the data years, methodology and limitations

Not included

  • Other physicians' figures and ranks
  • The market's cohort table, percentile table and market trend (the Market Comparison)
  • Peer comparison flags (professional subscription, not sold)

Known limitations

  • CMS suppresses code lines with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, so calculated work RVUs are a floor.
  • Not in the CMS file for 2013.
  • 2014: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (236).
  • 2015: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (230).
  • 2016: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (238).
  • 2017: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (247).
  • 2018: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (247).
  • 2019: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (251).
  • 2020: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (132).
  • 2021: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (131).
  • 2022: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (137).
  • 2023: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (141).
  • 2024: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (147).

Available data

years in the data
11
peers in the 2024 peer group
147
a report can be prepared
Yes
Data by year11 of 12 published
Data yearIn the CMS fileUsable for a reportPeer group for ranks
2013NoNo
2014YesYesstate peers, 236
2015YesYesstate peers, 230
2016YesYesstate peers, 238
2017YesYesstate peers, 247
2018YesYesstate peers, 247
2019YesYesstate peers, 251
2020YesYesstate peers, 132
2021YesYesstate peers, 131
2022YesYesstate peers, 137
2023YesYesstate peers, 141
2024YesYesstate peers, 147

Years Samuel M Wilson, DO is in the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners files. Ranks use same-specialty peers in the first of the metro, the state and the nation with at least 20 peers. How ranks are computed · Limitations

Where Samuel M Wilson, DO practices

Credentials
DO
Specialty on claims
Dermatology
Practice location on Medicare claims
Roosevelt, UTStreet address not shown unless the clinician turns it on.
Medicare participation
Participating (accepts assignment on all claims)
Years in the data
2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 (11 of 12 published)

Groups

Hospitals

Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians files, snapshot 2026-10-02. May lag reality.

Practice location and specialty by year

Show details11 years

The practice location on the claims changed between years. The specialty on the claims is the same in every year.

Data yearPractice location on Medicare claimsAreaSpecialty on claims
2014Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2015Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2016Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2017Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2018Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2019Mount Vernon, WAMount Vernon-Anacortes, WADermatology
2020Roosevelt, UT changedUtah outside metro areasDermatology
2021Roosevelt, UTUtah outside metro areasDermatology
2022Roosevelt, UTUtah outside metro areasDermatology
2023Roosevelt, UTUtah outside metro areasDermatology
2024Roosevelt, UTUtah outside metro areasDermatology

From the provider fields of each year's CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners file (the location and specialty on the claims, as CMS publishes them).

Peer group a report would use

Show details147 peers

For 2024, a Physician Report would place Samuel M Wilson, DO in a peer group of 147 Dermatology clinicians, Samuel M Wilson, DO included, at the state level (Utah).

Peers are clinicians with the same specialty on their claims, in the first of the metro area, the state and the nation that has enough of them. The sizes for every year are in the table under Available data.

Other Dermatology clinicians in Roosevelt

Show details1

Alphabetical by last name; all 1 whose practice location on Medicare claims is Roosevelt in 2024. All Dermatology clinicians in Roosevelt

About this data

Show details

This page comes from public files the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes each year: the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners files, which list the Part B services each clinician billed to Original Medicare, and the Doctors and Clinicians files, which list group and hospital affiliations. It covers Original Medicare fee-for-service only: Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial insurance are not in these files, and CMS leaves out any service line with fewer than 11 beneficiaries. The location and specialty are what the claims show, and affiliations are as of the snapshot date, so either can lag a recent change. A listing here says nothing about quality of care.

How the data is processed · Known limitations · Report an error

Physicians can claim their page for notices and a statement. Claiming does not show figures; those are in a Physician Report.

Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service only. Payments go to the billing entity, not to the clinician. Limitations · Methodology