See where Tamer O Katamesh, MD ranks among 170 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation peers

The Physician Report shows Medicare work, payment, the comparison with similar practices and the trend across the data years.

Reports are not on sale yet.

View sample report

Already purchased? Open your report

What the Physician Report contains

Show details13 known limitations

Included

  • Exact Medicare payment figures for each data year
  • Calculated Medicare fee-for-service work RVUs for each data year
  • Historical results for every data year with usable data
  • Peer comparisons: rank, percentile and rank band among the same specialty, the peer medians, and where the physician falls in the peer distribution
  • Beneficiaries, services, service mix and code-level lines
  • A printable report with the data years, methodology and limitations

Not included

  • Other physicians' figures and ranks
  • The market's cohort table, percentile table and market trend (the Market Comparison)
  • Peer comparison flags (professional subscription, not sold)

Known limitations

  • CMS suppresses code lines with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, so calculated work RVUs are a floor.
  • 2015: every code line is below the CMS reporting floor, so there are no code lines or work RVUs for that year.
  • Not in the CMS file for 2013, 2014.
  • 2015: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (339).
  • 2016: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (339).
  • 2017: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (174).
  • 2018: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (180).
  • 2019: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (179).
  • 2020: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (168).
  • 2021: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (164).
  • 2022: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (172).
  • 2023: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (174).
  • 2024: fewer than 20 peers in the metro, so ranks and percentiles use state peers (170).

Available data

years in the data
10
peers in the 2024 peer group
170
a report can be prepared
Yes
Data by year10 of 12 published
Data yearIn the CMS fileUsable for a reportPeer group for ranks
2013NoNo
2014NoNo
2015YesNo: every code line is below the CMS reporting floorstate peers, 339
2016YesYesstate peers, 339
2017YesYesstate peers, 174
2018YesYesstate peers, 180
2019YesYesstate peers, 179
2020YesYesstate peers, 168
2021YesYesstate peers, 164
2022YesYesstate peers, 172
2023YesYesstate peers, 174
2024YesYesstate peers, 170

Years Tamer O Katamesh, MD is in the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners files. Ranks use same-specialty peers in the first of the metro, the state and the nation with at least 20 peers. How ranks are computed · Limitations

Where Tamer O Katamesh, MD practices

Credentials
MD
Specialty on claims
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Practice location on Medicare claims
Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WI metroStreet address not shown unless the clinician turns it on.
Medicare participation
Participating (accepts assignment on all claims)
Years in the data
2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 (10 of 12 published)

Groups

Hospitals

Source: CMS Doctors and Clinicians files, snapshot 2026-10-02. May lag reality.

Practice location and specialty by year

Show details10 years

The practice location on the claims changed between years. The specialty on the claims is the same in every year.

Data yearPractice location on Medicare claimsAreaSpecialty on claims
2015Muskegon, MIMuskegon-Norton Shores, MIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2016Muskegon, MIMuskegon-Norton Shores, MIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2017Burlington, WI changedRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2018Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2019Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2020Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2021Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2022Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2023Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2024Burlington, WIRacine-Mount Pleasant, WIPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation

From the provider fields of each year's CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners file (the location and specialty on the claims, as CMS publishes them).

Peer group a report would use

Show details170 peers

For 2024, a Physician Report would place Tamer O Katamesh, MD in a peer group of 170 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinicians, Tamer O Katamesh, MD included, at the state level (Wisconsin).

Peers are clinicians with the same specialty on their claims, in the first of the metro area, the state and the nation that has enough of them. The sizes for every year are in the table under Available data.

About this data

Show details

This page comes from public files the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes each year: the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners files, which list the Part B services each clinician billed to Original Medicare, and the Doctors and Clinicians files, which list group and hospital affiliations. It covers Original Medicare fee-for-service only: Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and commercial insurance are not in these files, and CMS leaves out any service line with fewer than 11 beneficiaries. The location and specialty are what the claims show, and affiliations are as of the snapshot date, so either can lag a recent change. A listing here says nothing about quality of care.

How the data is processed · Known limitations · Report an error

Physicians can claim their page for notices and a statement. Claiming does not show figures; those are in a Physician Report.

Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service only. Payments go to the billing entity, not to the clinician. Limitations · Methodology