Hematology-Oncology in Minnesota
Individual Hematology-Oncology providers billing Original Medicare Part B in Minnesota: 189 in 2024.
See available data · View sample report · What a Market Comparison contains
Available data
- individual providers, 2024
- 189
- data years
- 5
- groups listed
- 8
Specialty, geography, providers by year and peer group
- Specialty
- Hematology-Oncology (the provider type on the Medicare claims record; individuals only)
- Geography
- Minnesota.
- Data years
- 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
- Providers by year
- 2020: 170 · 2021: 172 · 2022: 172 · 2023: 179 · 2024: 189
- Peer group for ranks
- The cohort is Minnesota itself: ranks and positions are among its own providers (at least 20), so no geographic fallback applies.
Fee schedule change for Hematology-Oncology, 2026 to 2027 (proposed rule)
At the 2027 proposed rule rates, the median change in calculated Medicare allowed for Hematology-Oncology clinicians in Minnesota is −2.8%, on the same services as in 2024 (middle half −3.3% to −2.6%, 182 clinicians).
calculated at each clinician's published code mix; volume held fixed; proposed rule.
By area, and what the calculation leaves out2 areas
| Area | Clinicians | Median change | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 182 | −2.8% | −3.3% to −2.6% |
| United States | 8,921 | −3.6% | −4.1% to −3.0% |
104 codes are new in the 2027 proposed rule (not in any 2024 code mix); 53 codes move to a national rate from a 2026 status without one (carrier-priced and others); lines in those codes are left out of the calculation.
Each clinician’s own figure, with the codes behind it, is in the Physician Report. How this is calculated.
Telehealth-only services and setting, Hematology-Oncology, 2020–2024
In 2024, 0.4% of Hematology-Oncology Medicare work in Minnesota was in telehealth-only services (3.6% in 2020), a floor of all telehealth work; 52% was billed at the office (non-facility) rate and 48% at the facility rate.
Share of work by setting, by year: table2 areas
Minnesota: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.6% | 46% | 51% | 164 | 48% |
| 2021 | 1.6% | 46% | 53% | 165 | 28% |
| 2022 | 1.1% | 45% | 54% | 169 | 18% |
| 2023 | 0.9% | 46% | 53% | 172 | 12% |
| 2024 | 0.4% | 52% | 48% | 182 | 9% |
United States: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.0% | 64% | 34% | 8,332 | 39% |
| 2021 | 1.2% | 64% | 35% | 8,436 | 24% |
| 2022 | 0.9% | 65% | 34% | 8,586 | 19% |
| 2023 | 0.6% | 65% | 34% | 8,659 | 14% |
| 2024 | 0.5% | 65% | 34% | 8,922 | 12% |
Telehealth-only services are codes that exist only as remote services (telephone and online visits, virtual check-ins, telehealth consultations). The share is a floor, not total telehealth: CMS publishes the place of service only as facility or non-facility and does not publish telehealth modifiers, so a video visit billed with an ordinary visit code is counted in the setting CMS records. Every year is weighted at the 2024 work relative values, so a share moves only when the services billed move. Cells of at least 11 clinicians. How this is calculated.
Market Comparison
One specialty in one market (a metro area, a state's area outside metro areas, a whole state or the United States): each cohort member's figures and rank, the distribution, percentiles and trend, plus the full report of a selected physician who is in that market, for 12 months.
Reports are not on sale yet.
View sample reportWhat the Market Comparison contains
Show details1 known limitation
Included
- The cohort table: each clinician's exact Medicare payment, calculated work RVUs and rank in this specialty and market
- A ranked list of every clinician in this specialty and market by Medicare payment or work RVUs, opening at the selected physician with those just above and below
- Each listed clinician's codes for a data year: every code line with place of service, services, beneficiaries, Medicare payment and work RVUs
- Medians, percentiles, the distribution and the trend for this specialty and market
- Estimated figures and the offer calculator for this market
- The full Physician Report of the selected physician, when that physician is in this market
- A downloadable market report (PDF)
Not included
- Other specialties and other markets
- Multi-year history, peer comparisons and the printable report of clinicians other than the selected physician (each one's Physician Report)
- Peer comparison flags (professional subscription, not sold)
Known limitations
- CMS suppresses code lines with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, so calculated work RVUs are a floor.
Hematology-Oncology by metro area in Minnesota
Show details13 areas
A Market Comparison is also prepared for each metro area and for the area outside metro areas. Alphabetical; provider counts are for 2024.
- Alexandria, MN (2)
- Austin, MN (1)
- Bemidji, MN (1)
- Brainerd, MN (3)
- Duluth, MN-WI (15)
- Fergus Falls, MN (1)
- Hutchinson, MN (1)
- Mankato, MN (3)
- Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI (102)
- Minnesota outside metro areas (1)
- New Ulm, MN (1)
- Rochester, MN (56)
- St. Cloud, MN (4)
Groups with the most Hematology-Oncology providers in Minnesota
Show details8 groups
- Mayo Clinic (39 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Fairview Express Care (31 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Park Nicollet Clinic (17 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA (13 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Allina Health System (12 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Group Health Inc (12 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Fairview Specialty Services (7 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- The Duluth Clinic Ltd (6 Hematology-Oncology providers)
Group affiliation: CMS Doctors and Clinicians file; data year 2024. Ordered by the count of providers of the specialty, then by name; groups tied at the end of the list are left out.
Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service only; payments go to the billing entity. How every figure is computed: methodology, including known limitations.
Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners public use files (Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service).