Hematology-Oncology in South Dakota
Individual Hematology-Oncology providers billing Original Medicare Part B in South Dakota: 23 in 2024.
See available data · View sample report · What a Market Comparison contains
Available data
- individual providers, 2024
- 23
- data years
- 5
- groups listed
- 6
Specialty, geography, providers by year and peer group
- Specialty
- Hematology-Oncology (the provider type on the Medicare claims record; individuals only)
- Geography
- South Dakota.
- Data years
- 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
- Providers by year
- 2020: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2024: 23
- Peer group for ranks
- The cohort is South Dakota itself: ranks and positions are among its own providers (at least 20), so no geographic fallback applies.
Fee schedule change for Hematology-Oncology, 2026 to 2027 (proposed rule)
At the 2027 proposed rule rates, the median change in calculated Medicare allowed for Hematology-Oncology clinicians in South Dakota is −4.3%, on the same services as in 2024 (middle half −4.5% to −4.2%, 23 clinicians).
calculated at each clinician's published code mix; volume held fixed; proposed rule.
By area, and what the calculation leaves out2 areas
| Area | Clinicians | Median change | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | 23 | −4.3% | −4.5% to −4.2% |
| United States | 8,921 | −3.6% | −4.1% to −3.0% |
104 codes are new in the 2027 proposed rule (not in any 2024 code mix); 53 codes move to a national rate from a 2026 status without one (carrier-priced and others); lines in those codes are left out of the calculation.
Each clinician’s own figure, with the codes behind it, is in the Physician Report. How this is calculated.
Telehealth-only services and setting, Hematology-Oncology, 2020–2024
In 2024, 0.0% of Hematology-Oncology Medicare work in South Dakota was in telehealth-only services (2.6% in 2020), a floor of all telehealth work; 35% was billed at the office (non-facility) rate and 65% at the facility rate.
Share of work by setting, by year: table2 areas
South Dakota: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.6% | 29% | 69% | 19 | 63% |
| 2021 | 0.3% | 30% | 69% | 20 | 5% |
| 2022 | 0.4% | 24% | 76% | 21 | 5% |
| 2023 | under 0.1% | 34% | 66% | 23 | 4% |
| 2024 | 0.0% | 35% | 65% | 23 | 0% |
United States: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2.0% | 64% | 34% | 8,332 | 39% |
| 2021 | 1.2% | 64% | 35% | 8,436 | 24% |
| 2022 | 0.9% | 65% | 34% | 8,586 | 19% |
| 2023 | 0.6% | 65% | 34% | 8,659 | 14% |
| 2024 | 0.5% | 65% | 34% | 8,922 | 12% |
Telehealth-only services are codes that exist only as remote services (telephone and online visits, virtual check-ins, telehealth consultations). The share is a floor, not total telehealth: CMS publishes the place of service only as facility or non-facility and does not publish telehealth modifiers, so a video visit billed with an ordinary visit code is counted in the setting CMS records. Every year is weighted at the 2024 work relative values, so a share moves only when the services billed move. Cells of at least 11 clinicians. How this is calculated.
Market Comparison
One specialty in one market (a metro area, a state's area outside metro areas, a whole state or the United States): each cohort member's figures and rank, the distribution, percentiles and trend, plus the full report of a selected physician who is in that market, for 12 months.
Reports are not on sale yet.
View sample reportWhat the Market Comparison contains
Show details1 known limitation
Included
- The cohort table: each clinician's exact Medicare payment, calculated work RVUs and rank in this specialty and market
- A ranked list of every clinician in this specialty and market by Medicare payment or work RVUs, opening at the selected physician with those just above and below
- Each listed clinician's codes for a data year: every code line with place of service, services, beneficiaries, Medicare payment and work RVUs
- Medians, percentiles, the distribution and the trend for this specialty and market
- Estimated figures and the offer calculator for this market
- The full Physician Report of the selected physician, when that physician is in this market
- A downloadable market report (PDF)
Not included
- Other specialties and other markets
- Multi-year history, peer comparisons and the printable report of clinicians other than the selected physician (each one's Physician Report)
- Peer comparison flags (professional subscription, not sold)
Known limitations
- CMS suppresses code lines with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, so calculated work RVUs are a floor.
Hematology-Oncology by metro area in South Dakota
Show details5 areas
A Market Comparison is also prepared for each metro area and for the area outside metro areas. Alphabetical; provider counts are for 2024.
- Aberdeen, SD (1)
- Rapid City, SD (2)
- Sioux Falls, SD-MN (16)
- Watertown, SD (3)
- Yankton, SD (1)
Groups with the most Hematology-Oncology providers in South Dakota
Show details6 groups
- Avera Mckennan (8 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Sanford Medical Center (6 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Monument Health Rapid City Hospital Inc (2 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Avera St Marys (1 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Conklin Clinics Prof LLC (1 Hematology-Oncology providers)
- Prairie Lakes Health Care System Inc (1 Hematology-Oncology providers)
Group affiliation: CMS Doctors and Clinicians file; data year 2024. Ordered by the count of providers of the specialty, then by name; groups tied at the end of the list are left out.
Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service only; payments go to the billing entity. How every figure is computed: methodology, including known limitations.
Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners public use files (Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service).