Obstetrics & Gynecology in Texas
Individual Obstetrics & Gynecology providers billing Original Medicare Part B in Texas: 1,532 in 2024.
See available data · View sample report · What a Market Comparison contains
Available data
- individual providers, 2024
- 1,532
- data years
- 12
- groups listed
- 9
Specialty, geography, providers by year and peer group
- Specialty
- Obstetrics & Gynecology (the provider type on the Medicare claims record; individuals only)
- Geography
- Texas.
- Data years
- 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
- Providers by year
- 2013: 1,990 · 2014: 1,960 · 2015: 1,931 · 2016: 1,919 · 2017: 1,883 · 2018: 1,884 · 2019: 1,860 · 2020: 1,729 · 2021: 1,723 · 2022: 1,626 · 2023: 1,567 · 2024: 1,532
- Peer group for ranks
- The cohort is Texas itself: ranks and positions are among its own providers (at least 20), so no geographic fallback applies.
Fee schedule change for Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2026 to 2027 (proposed rule)
At the 2027 proposed rule rates, the median change in calculated Medicare allowed for Obstetrics & Gynecology clinicians in Texas is −2.4%, on the same services as in 2024 (middle half −2.9% to −1.5%, 1,137 clinicians).
calculated at each clinician's published code mix; volume held fixed; proposed rule.
By area, and what the calculation leaves out2 areas
| Area | Clinicians | Median change | Middle half |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 1,137 | −2.4% | −2.9% to −1.5% |
| United States | 17,303 | −2.1% | −3.0% to −1.3% |
104 codes are new in the 2027 proposed rule (not in any 2024 code mix); 53 codes move to a national rate from a 2026 status without one (carrier-priced and others); lines in those codes are left out of the calculation.
Each clinician’s own figure, with the codes behind it, is in the Physician Report. How this is calculated.
Telehealth-only services and setting, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013–2024
In 2024, under 0.1% of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medicare work in Texas was in telehealth-only services (0.0% in 2013), a floor of all telehealth work; 75% was billed at the office (non-facility) rate and 25% at the facility rate.
Share of work by setting, by year: table2 areas
Texas: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.0% | 82% | 18% | 1,686 | 0% |
| 2014 | 0.0% | 83% | 17% | 1,627 | 0% |
| 2015 | 0.0% | 83% | 17% | 1,580 | 0% |
| 2016 | 0.0% | 84% | 16% | 1,577 | 0% |
| 2017 | 0.0% | 83% | 17% | 1,495 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0.0% | 81% | 19% | 1,464 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0.0% | 81% | 19% | 1,458 | 0% |
| 2020 | 0.4% | 83% | 17% | 1,324 | 2% |
| 2021 | 0.1% | 83% | 17% | 1,317 | 1% |
| 2022 | under 0.1% | 79% | 21% | 1,242 | 0% |
| 2023 | under 0.1% | 78% | 22% | 1,191 | 0% |
| 2024 | under 0.1% | 75% | 25% | 1,138 | 0% |
United States: share of calculated Medicare work RVUs by setting
| Year | Telehealth-only | Office rate | Facility rate | Clinicians | Share with any telehealth-only |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.0% | 84% | 16% | 23,078 | 0% |
| 2014 | 0.0% | 84% | 16% | 22,798 | 0% |
| 2015 | 0.0% | 84% | 16% | 22,382 | 0% |
| 2016 | 0.0% | 85% | 15% | 22,176 | 0% |
| 2017 | 0.0% | 84% | 16% | 21,537 | 0% |
| 2018 | 0.0% | 83% | 17% | 21,355 | 0% |
| 2019 | 0.0% | 82% | 18% | 21,016 | 0% |
| 2020 | 0.6% | 83% | 17% | 18,891 | 3% |
| 2021 | 0.4% | 83% | 17% | 19,074 | 2% |
| 2022 | 0.3% | 81% | 18% | 18,289 | 1% |
| 2023 | 0.3% | 80% | 20% | 17,836 | 1% |
| 2024 | 0.3% | 80% | 20% | 17,307 | 1% |
Telehealth-only services are codes that exist only as remote services (telephone and online visits, virtual check-ins, telehealth consultations). The share is a floor, not total telehealth: CMS publishes the place of service only as facility or non-facility and does not publish telehealth modifiers, so a video visit billed with an ordinary visit code is counted in the setting CMS records. Every year is weighted at the 2024 work relative values, so a share moves only when the services billed move. Cells of at least 11 clinicians. How this is calculated.
Market Comparison
One specialty in one market (a metro area, a state's area outside metro areas, a whole state or the United States): each cohort member's figures and rank, the distribution, percentiles and trend, plus the full report of a selected physician who is in that market, for 12 months.
Reports are not on sale yet.
View sample reportWhat the Market Comparison contains
Show details2 known limitations
Included
- The cohort table: each clinician's exact Medicare payment, calculated work RVUs and rank in this specialty and market
- A ranked list of every clinician in this specialty and market by Medicare payment or work RVUs, opening at the selected physician with those just above and below
- Each listed clinician's codes for a data year: every code line with place of service, services, beneficiaries, Medicare payment and work RVUs
- Medians, percentiles, the distribution and the trend for this specialty and market
- Estimated figures and the offer calculator for this market
- The full Physician Report of the selected physician, when that physician is in this market
- A downloadable market report (PDF)
Not included
- Other specialties and other markets
- Multi-year history, peer comparisons and the printable report of clinicians other than the selected physician (each one's Physician Report)
- Peer comparison flags (professional subscription, not sold)
Known limitations
- CMS suppresses code lines with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, so calculated work RVUs are a floor.
- Estimated figures are not part of this Market Comparison: no sourced Medicare share of work for this specialty, or anesthesia, whose work RVUs are not measured.
Obstetrics & Gynecology by metro area in Texas
Show details53 areas
A Market Comparison is also prepared for each metro area and for the area outside metro areas. Alphabetical; provider counts are for 2024.
- Abilene, TX (10)
- Alice, TX (1)
- Amarillo, TX (18)
- Athens, TX (2)
- Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX (163)
- Bay City, TX (2)
- Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX (8)
- Big Spring, TX (2)
- Borger, TX (1)
- Brenham, TX (2)
- Brownsville-Harlingen, TX (16)
- Brownwood, TX (2)
- College Station-Bryan, TX (17)
- Corpus Christi, TX (23)
- Corsicana, TX (2)
- Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX (416)
- Eagle Pass, TX (1)
- El Campo, TX (2)
- El Paso, TX (41)
- Fredericksburg, TX (2)
- Gainesville, TX (1)
- Granbury, TX (3)
- Hereford, TX (1)
- Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX (367)
- Jacksonville, TX (1)
- Kerrville, TX (7)
- Killeen-Temple, TX (31)
- Kingsville, TX (3)
- Laredo, TX (10)
- Longview, TX (11)
- Lubbock, TX (24)
- Lufkin, TX (5)
- McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX (30)
- Midland, TX (10)
- Mineral Wells, TX (1)
- Mount Pleasant, TX (3)
- Nacogdoches, TX (7)
- Odessa, TX (14)
- Palestine, TX (4)
- Paris, TX (6)
- San Angelo, TX (11)
- San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX (153)
- Sherman-Denison, TX (7)
- Stephenville, TX (2)
- Sulphur Springs, TX (4)
- Sweetwater, TX (2)
- Texarkana, TX-AR (10)
- Texas outside metro areas (8)
- Tyler, TX (22)
- Uvalde, TX (1)
- Victoria, TX (8)
- Waco, TX (20)
- Wichita Falls, TX (13)
Groups with the most Obstetrics & Gynecology providers in Texas
Show details9 groups
- Unified Womens Healthcare Of Texas PLLC (108 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Privia Medical Group Gulf Coast PLLC (51 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Scott And White Clinic (50 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Seton Family Of Doctors (49 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Tmh Physician Associates PLLC (44 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Texas Health Care PLLC (43 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Houston Methodist Specialty Physicians (42 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Obhg Texas Holdings PA (42 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
- Ut Physicians (34 Obstetrics & Gynecology providers)
Group affiliation: CMS Doctors and Clinicians file; data year 2024. Ordered by the count of providers of the specialty, then by name; groups tied at the end of the list are left out.
Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service only; payments go to the billing entity. How every figure is computed: methodology, including known limitations.
Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners public use files (Original Medicare Part B fee-for-service).